Cine-Excess E-Journal 1 (1) (2013)

Steve Jones
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Tom Six’s The Human Centipede (First Sequence) (2009) and The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) (2011) are based on a disturbing premise: people are abducted and stitched together mouth-to-anus. The consequent combinations of faeces and bloodshed, torture and degradation have been roundly vilified by the critical press. Additionally, the sequel was officially banned or heavily censored in numerous countries. This article argues that these reactive forms of suppression fail to engage with the films themselves, or the concepts (such as disgust and offense) on which those judgements are made. Six’s films are far more sophisticated than has been accounted for. These films wear their generic lineage on their grimy sleeves, contextualising conventional motifs such as the mad scientist archetype against contemporary cultural anxieties regarding the body, sex and violence. Furthermore, Six’s constructed persona exposes the interplay between commercial success, grotesquery and censoriousness as a cyclic system that can be abused. Thus, the series epitomises how repulsion can be strategically utilised. Six anticipates his detractors’ offense, and disarms them of their ability to critique his films without adding to their notoriety. The Human Centipede films demonstrate how controversy can be tactically generated to create meaning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Do Animals Feel Pain?Peter Singer - 1990 - In Peter. Singer (ed.), Animal Liberation. Avon Books.
Chronic Pain - the Ethics of Care, Belief and Coping.Kate Jones - 2006 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 11 (4):6.
The Benefits of Pain.Siri Leknes & Brock Bastian - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):57-70.
The Neurophilosophy of Pain.Grant R. Gillett - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (April):191-206.
Human Dignity and the Ethics and Aesthetics of Pain and Suffering.Daryl Pullman - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (1):75-94.
The Place of Pain in Human Experience.G. Lewis - 1978 - Journal of Medical Ethics 4 (3):122-125.


Added to PP index

Total views
138 ( #70,049 of 2,409,637 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #17,080 of 2,409,637 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes