Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (2):233-248 (2020)

Authors
Ben Jones
Pennsylvania State University
Abstract
Those who care about and engage in politics frequently fall victim to cognitive bias. Concerns that such bias impacts scholarship recently have prompted debates—notably, in philosophy and psychology—on the proper relationship between research and politics. One proposal emerging from these debates is that researchers studying politics have a professional duty to avoid political activism because it risks biasing their work. While sympathetic to the motivations behind this proposal, I suggest several reasons to reject a blanket duty to avoid activism: (1) even if it reduced bias, this duty would make unreasonable demands on researchers; (2) this duty could hinder research by limiting viewpoint diversity; (3) this duty wrongly implies that academia offers a relative haven from bias compared to politics; and (4) not all forms of political activism pose an equal risk of bias. None of these points suggest that researchers should ignore the risk of bias. Rather, researchers should focus on stronger evidence-based strategies for reducing bias than a blanket recommendation to avoid politics.
Keywords activism  bias  diversity  politics  professional ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12366
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Popularizing Moral Philosophy by Acting as a Moral Expert.Frauke Albersmeier - 2022 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):287-312.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does Consent Bias Research?Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):27 - 37.
The “Bias” Bias in Social Psychology: Adaptive When and How?James Friedrich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):335-336.
The New Transnational Activism.Sidney Tarrow - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Good Women and Bad Men: A Bias in Feminist Research.Iddo Landau - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (1):141-150.
Evaluation of Research(Ers) and its Threat to Epistemic Pluralisms.Marco Viola - 2017 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13 (2):55-78.
Shareholder Activism: A Multidisciplinary View.Maria Goranova & Lori Verstegen Ryan - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:160-169.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-29

Total views
246 ( #45,744 of 2,520,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,829 of 2,520,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes