The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning
Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (1):76-80 (1988)
Abstract
In this engaging study, the authors put casuistry into its historical context, tracing the origin of moral reasoning in antiquity, its peak during the sixteenth and early seventeenth century, and its subsequent fall into disrepute from the mid-seventeenth century.Author's Profile
Reprint years
1991
ISBN(s)
9780520069602
DOI
10.1086/293127
My notes
Similar books and articles
Book Review:The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Albert R. Jonsen, Stephen Toulmin. [REVIEW]Kenneth W. Kemp - 1989 - Ethics 99 (4):945-.
How Jonsen really views casuistry: A note on the abuse of father Wildes.James M. Tallmon - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):103-113.
Stephan Toulmin: The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning. [REVIEW]Jean-Claude Wolf - 1989 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 36:223-225.
The priesthood of bioethics and the return of casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):33-49.
Respondeo: Method and content in casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning.Carl Elliott - 1992 - Philosophical Books 33 (4):242-243.
The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning.B. Hoose - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (4):221-221.
The Interdependence of Narrative and Casuistry in Practical Moral Reasoning.Thomas Burns Leininger - 1998 - Dissertation, Graduate Theological Union
Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics.John Arras - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):29-51.
Case Studies and Moral Conclusions: The Philosophical Use of Case Studies in Biomedical Ethics.Rolland W. Pack - 1988 - Dissertation, Georgetown University
On the intersection of casuistry and particularism.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (4):307-322.
New casuistry: what’s new?Theo Van Willigenburg - 1998 - Philosophical Explorations 1 (2):152 – 164.
Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
Critiques of casuistry and why they are mistaken.Carson Strong - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):395-411.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-04
Downloads
77 (#159,229)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2015-02-04
Downloads
77 (#159,229)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Moral uncertainty and fetishistic motivation.Andrew Sepielli - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (11):2951-2968.
Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence‐based approaches.Mark R. Tonelli - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):248-256.
Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload.Jeroen Van den Hoven, Gert-Jan Lokhorst & Ibo Van de Poel - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):143-155.
If P , then what? Thinking in cases.John Forrester - 1996 - History of the Human Sciences 9 (3):1-25.
Rethinking the Belmont Report?Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15-21.
