Philosophy East and West 54 (3):302-321 (2004)
Can contradictions be meaningful? How can one assert 'P soku not-P' or 'P and yet not-P' without sacrificing intelligibility? Expanding on previous attempts, mainly by Dilworth and Heisig, to demystify the soku connective, a formal system is presented here for the logic of soku. Through a formal distinction between internal and external negation, grammatical features of the soku connective are shown to be logically irrelevant, and the principle of non-contradiction is preserved. Disparities with traditional logic are noted, with a focus on negation rather than 'soku'. The formal examination of the logic of soku is intended to present the logic in a way acceptable to more analytically minded philosophers and thereby enhance East-West and Japanese-Anglo-American interaction and criticism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Absurdity as Unary Operator.Sergei P. Odintsov - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):225-242.
The Relation Between Formal and Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):265-274.
Contra-Classical Logics.Lloyd Humberstone - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):438 – 474.
On the Role of Implication in Formal Logic.Jonathan P. Seldin - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1076-1114.
The Pleasures of Anticipation: Enriching Intuitionistic Logic. [REVIEW]Lloyd Humberstone - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (5):395-438.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #76,242 of 2,158,842 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,842 )
How can I increase my downloads?