Abstract
Are there any viable semiotic objections to commodification? A semiotic objection holds that even if there is no independent consequentialist or deontic objection to the marketing of a good—such as that it is exploitative or causes third party harm—there remains a problem with what is said by participating in that market. Recent discussion of semiotic objections have suffered from a basic ambiguity in such talk. As Grice pointed out, there is a difference between saying that smoke on the horizon means fire, and saying that it means there will be war tomorrow. We could say that in the former case smoke indicates fire because of its causal connection with fire, while in the latter case smoke expresses a call to war because that is the non-natural meaning given to it by convention or by its place in a communicative practice. The recent defenses of semiotic objections presented by Anthony Booth, Jacob Sparks, and Mark Wells do not survive this distinction, as they either complain about non-semiotic facts that are indicated rather than expressed by markets, or they complain about semiotic features of markets, but these complaints inevitably collapse into weak consequentialist objections. But this result is not bad for anticommodificationists, as semiotic objections have dialectical disadvantages.
Keywords Commodification  Expressive objections  Grice  Markets  Revealed preferences  Semiotic objections
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.26556/jesp.v15i2.646
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Meaning.H. Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Truth and Meaning.Donald Davidson - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):304-323.
Truth and Meaning.Donald Davidson - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):304-323.
Hypocrisy, Moral Address, and the Equal Standing of Persons.R. Jay Wallace - 2010 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (4):307-341.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Semiotic Limits to Markets Defended.David Rondel - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-16.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Impure Semiotic Objections to Markets.David G. Dick - 2018 - Public Affairs Quarterly 32 (3):227-246.
Can’T Buy Me Love.Jacob Sparks - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Research 42:341-352.
Semiotic Arguments and Markets in Votes.James Stacey Taylor - 2017 - Business Ethics Journal Review 5 (6):35-39.
How Fit is the Semiotic Animal?Stéphanie Walsh Matthews - 2016 - American Journal of Semiotics 32 (1/4):205-217.
Trademarks as a System of Signs: A Semiotic Look at Trademark Law.Meghann L. Garrett - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (1):61-75.
War as an Institutional Fact: Semiotics and Institutional Legal Theory. [REVIEW]Hanneke van Schooten - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (3):307-320.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-22

Total views
24 ( #452,038 of 2,445,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #232,475 of 2,445,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes