The virtues of non-reduction, even when reduction is a virtue

Philosophical Forum 34 (4):121-140 (2003)
Authors
Todd Jones
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Abstract
This paper aims to reduce the confusion about what our proper attitudes toward reductionism should be. I will begin by saying briefly why reductive explanations are generally desirable. I will then spend the bulk of the paper laying out what I consider to be the best epistemic reasons for thinking that developing non-reductive accounts is also highly desirable. I aim to show that the best arguments for the desirability of reduction, and for the desirability of non-reduction, are rooted less in any deep metaphysical principles, and more in the general nuts and bolts of information storage in cognitive agents.
Keywords Reductionism  anti-reductionism  subsumption  explanation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9191.00130
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reduction in Sociology.W. McGinley - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):370-398.
Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make a Case for Methodological Individualism?Jeroen Van Bouwel - forthcoming - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie:1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reduction, Elimination, and Firewalking.Colin Cheyne - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):349-357.
Reduction and Genetics.David L. Hull - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):125-144.
Reduction and Anti-Reduction: Rights and Wrongs.Todd Jones - 2004 - Metaphilosophy 25 (5):614-647.
Popper's Naturalized Approach to the Reduction of Chemistry.Eric R. Scerri - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):33 – 44.
Identity-Based Reduction and Reductive Explanation.Raphael van Riel - 2010 - Philosophia Naturalis 47 (1-2):183-219.
Is Functional Reduction Logical Reduction?Max Kistler - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (14):219-234.
Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras.Kevin Morris - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):647-657.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
26 ( #263,942 of 2,313,599 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #565,222 of 2,313,599 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature