What are we doing when we perceive numbers?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Clarke and Beck rightly contend that the number sense allows us to directly perceive number. However, they unnecessarily assume a representationalist approach and incur a heavy theoretical cost by invoking “modes of presentation.” We suggest that the relevant evidence is better explained by adopting a radical enactivist approach that avoids characterizing the approximate number system as a system for representing number.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,385

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-16

Downloads
31 (#510,871)

6 months
10 (#392,023)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Karim Zahidi
University of Antwerp
Daniel D. Hutto
University of Wollongong
Max Jones
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Radicalizing numerical cognition.Karim Zahidi - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 1):529-545.
Re-doing the math: making enactivism add up.Daniel D. Hutto - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (3):827-837.
Correction to: Numerals and neural reuse.Max Jones - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3683-3683.
Number concepts for the concept empiricist.Max Jones - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (3):334-348.

Add more references