The World Trade Organization has faced many criticisms from human rights and social justice advocates. And yet it is difficult to identify direct clashes between WTO obligations and human rights obligations. Nevertheless, as demonstrated in this article, the concerns of WTO critics are justifiable, for example in the areas of the organisation's democratic deficit, the effect of its rules on developing States, and in the arena of labour rights. The criticisms are not, as it were, manifestations of mere 'regime envy' by social justice constituencies. Indeed, the present imbalance in effectiveness between international economic institutions and international social justice institutions must be redressed. Comments are welcome - Please either use SSRN comments or email to the author.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Capturing the Benefits of Trade? Local Content Requirements in Wto Law and the Human Rights-Based Approach to Development.Gillian Moon - unknown
Are Pharmaceutical Patents Protected by Human Rights?Joseph Millum - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):e25-e25.
Globalization, Human Rights, and the Social Determinants of Health.Audrey R. Chapman - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (2):97-111.
Is Today's International Human Rights System a Global Governance Regime?James W. Nickel - 2002 - Journal of Ethics 6 (4):353-371.
Business and the International Human Rights Regime: A Comparison of UN Initiatives. [REVIEW]Nina Seppala - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):401 - 417.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #350,292 of 2,158,859 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,859 )
How can I increase my downloads?