Living wills and substituted judgments: A critical analysis


Abstract
In the literature three mechanisms are commonly distinguished to make decisions about the care of incompetent patients: A living will, a substituted judgment by a surrogate (who may or may not hold the power of attorney ), and a best interest judgment. Almost universally, the third mechanism is deemed the worst possible of the three, to be invoked only when the former two are unavailable. In this article, I argue in favor of best interest judgments. The evermore common aversion of best interest judgments entails a risk that health care providers withdraw from the decision-making process, abandoning patients (or their family members) to these most difficult of decisions about life and death. My approach in this article is primarily negative, that is, I criticize the alleged superiority of the living will and substituted judgment. The latter two mechanisms gain their alleged superiority because they are supposedly morally neutral, whereas the best interest judgment entails a value judgment on behalf of the patient. I argue that on closer inspection living wills and substituted judgments are not morally neutral; indeed, they generally rely on best interest judgments, even if those are not made explicit
Keywords advance directives  best interest judgments  competence  decision making  incompetence  living will  power of attorney for health care  proxy decision making  substituted decision making  surrogate decision making
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1011450017960
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,645
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Love as a Regulative Ideal in Surrogate Decision Making.Erica Lucast Stonestreet - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (5):523-542.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Caring for Decisionally Incapacitated Elderly.Dallas M. High - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1).
Substituted Judgment, Best Interests, and the Need for Best Respect.Susan R. Martyn - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (2):195.
Wayne Martin on Judgment. [REVIEW]Hans Sluga - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):109 - 119.
Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Causal Judgment and Moral Judgment: Two Experiments.Joshua Knobe & Ben Fraser - 2008 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology. MIT Press.
Moral Realism and Moral Judgments.Frederik Kaufman - 1992 - Erkenntnis 36 (1):103 - 112.
Determining Proxy Consent.Richard O'Neil - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):389-403.
Universalizability in Moral Judgments.Chris Bessemans - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):397-404.
Value-Judgements and Values.Abdullah Kaygi - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:97-102.
Review: Wayne Martin on Judgment. [REVIEW]Hans Sluga - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):109-119.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-31

Total views
32 ( #237,452 of 2,325,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #272,889 of 2,325,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature