Diogenes 51 (1):17-26 (2004)
AbstractCollective memory is neither spontaneous nor random, but the result of a series of selective practices. It establishes group identity and sets power relations between groups. The author considers the process of selection through a case study of the transformation of Franco’s regime in Spain into a democracy. Collective memory of the time is shown to be organized around an event (the Munich Coalition or contubernio) and around the democratic transition. The author traces two opposing notions, negationist (denying any importance to Munich) and the pro-democratic, and concludes that the memory of the transition is only the memory of those who won the civil war, who were also those who engineered the transition itself
Similar books and articles
Cartographies of Culture: Memory, Space, Representation.Wojciech Kalaga & Marzena Kubisz (eds.) - 2010 - Peter Lang.
Collective memory, group minds, and the extended mind thesis.Robert A. Wilson - 2005 - Cognitive Processing 6 (4).
Risdon Vale: Place, memory, and suburban experience.Kate Booth - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):299 – 311.
From individual memory to collective memory: Theoretical and empirical perspectives.Amanda Barnier & John Sutton - 2008 - Memory 16 (3):177-182.
Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies.Wulf Kansteiner - 2002 - History and Theory 41 (2):179–197.
Memory and the abyss of communication: Philosophers' collective memory, citation and meaning attribution.Efi Kyprianidou - 2011 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 2 (2):181-194.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads