The Relationship between Medicine's Internal Morality and Religion

Christian Bioethics 8 (2):175-198 (2002)
In the face of managed care and market economies infringing on the practice of medicine, reducing its autonomy and determining the moral guidelines for medical practice, many physicians are calling out for a return to what is perceived as a traditional medical ethic. Many religiously motivated critics of certain modern developments in medicine have made similar appeals. These calls are best understood as an attempt to define medicine as a practice that is necessarily ethical in nature, a practice the moral basis of which is internal to that practice. This article examines and assesses this definition of medicine in reference to Aristotle's division of human undertakings into three distinct categories: theory, poieisis (i.e., production), and praxis. It is concluded that medicine can be understood as a praxis (as opposed to a theory or production, both of which are morally neutral), because the practice of medicine, and all of its constitutive acts, can only be explained and assessed in reference to health, which is itself a final good and hence of moral value. Such an understanding would immunize medicine against usurpation by the free market. However, by the same token it would also dissociate medicine from all other moralities external to it, including those grounded in faith and religion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1076/chbi.
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,162
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Internal Morality of Medicine: An Evolutionary Perspective.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):581 – 599.
A Method in Search of a Purpose: The Internal Morality of Medicine.John D. Arras - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):643 – 662.
The Impossibility of a Morality Internal to Medicine.Robert M. Veatch - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):621 – 642.
The Relationship Between Law and Morality From the Internal Point of View.Gülriz Uygur - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:177-183.
The Internal Morality of Medicine: An Introduction.Robert M. Veatch & Franklin G. Miller - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):555 – 557.
Internal and External Standards for Medical Morality.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):601 – 619.
Is Religion Dangerous?Keith Ward - 2006 - William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
The Evolution of Morality and Religion.Donald M. Broom - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Viktor Emil Von Gebsattel on the Doctor-Patient Relationship.Jos V. M. Welie - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #454,478 of 2,152,270 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #162,788 of 2,152,270 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums