Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status?”

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):W6-W8 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I focus on the concept of human dignity and critically assess whether such a concept, as used in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, is indeed a useful tool for bioethical debates. However, I consider this concept within the context of the development of emerging technologies, that is, with a particular focus on transhumanism. The question I address is not whether attaching artificial limbs or enhancing particular traits or capacities would dehumanize or undignify persons but whether nonbiological entities introduced into or attached to the human body contribute to the “augmentation” of human dignity. First, I outline briefly how the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights uses the concept of dignity. Second, I look at the possibility of a universal bioethics in relation to the concept of human dignity. Third, I examine the concept of posthuman dignity and whether the concept of human dignity as construed in the declaration has any relevance to posthuman dignity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-12

Downloads
17 (#871,438)

6 months
4 (#796,002)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

In defense of posthuman dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Dignity.Aurel Kolnai - 1976 - Philosophy 51 (197):251 - 271.
Dignity, Arête , and Hubris in the Transhumanist Debate.John Z. Sadler - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):67-68.

View all 12 references / Add more references