Are There Universal Collective Rights?

Human Rights Review 11 (1):17-44 (2010)

Miodrag Jovanovic
University of Belgrade
The first part of the paper focuses on the current debate over the universality of human rights. After conceptually distinguishing between different types of universality, it employs Sen’s definition that the claim of a universal value is the one that people anywhere may have reason to see as valuable. When applied to human rights, this standard implies “thin” (relative, contingent) universality, which might be operationally worked-out as in Donnelly’s three-tiered scheme of concepts–conceptions–implementations. The second part is devoted to collective rights, which have recently become a new topic of the human rights debate. This part provides the basis of political–philosophical justification and legal–theoretical conceptualization of collective rights, as rights directly vested in collective entities. The third part dwells on the problem of universality of collective rights. It differentiates between the three main collective entities in international law—peoples, minorities, and indigenous peoples—and investigates whether certain rights vested in these collectives might, according to Sen’s standard, acquire the status of the universal ones. After determining that some rights are, in principle, plausible candidates for such a status in international law, this paper concludes by taking notice of a number of the open issues that still need to be settled, primarily by the cooperative endeavor of international legal scholars and legal theorists
Keywords Universality  Human rights  Collective rights  Peoples  Minorities  Indigenous peoples
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12142-008-0110-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,419
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Are There Any Natural Rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Same-Sex Marriage and Equality.Reginald Williams - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):589-595.
Human Rights Enjoyment in Theory and Activism.Brooke Ackerly - 2011 - Human Rights Review 12 (2):221-239.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Self-Determination as a Universal Human Right.Cindy Holder - 2006 - Human Rights Review 7 (4):5-18.
Individuals and Relational Beings.P. J. Lomelino - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:87-101.
Human Rights Enjoyment in Theory and Activism.Brooke Ackerly - 2011 - Human Rights Review 12 (2):221-239.
History, Human Rights, and Globalization.Sumner B. Twiss - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):39-70.
Value Collectivism, Collective Rights, and Self-Threatening Theory.Dwight G. Newman - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (1):197-210.
May Western Rights, by Extension, Become Human Rights?Antonio Pérez-Estévez - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:61-72.
The Non-Modularity of Moral Knowledge.Theresa Waynand Tobin - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:33-50.


Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #142,620 of 2,272,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #109,904 of 2,272,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature