Abstract
This dissertation is a polemical exegesis of Heidegger's 1920's position with respect to the foundational, extracting from his thought an original pre-conception of the foundational which does not conform to current patterns of Heidegger interpretation. This might be expressed as a rescuing of foundations from metaphysics. The first half of the dissertation concentrates on methodological idiosyncracies in the semantic, syntactic and macrostructural organisation of foundational ideas, an analysis which begins to yield a number of "patterns" embedded in the language and thinking of Heidegger, patterns which, for example, subvert the propositional and reverse the normal processes of understanding. These patterns are "paratypes", the tools of "disas-sembling" (the latter term describes that in Heidegger's thought which provides the original motivation for the later development of deconstruction). The second half of the dissertation applies and extends these findings in two directions: firstly, with respect to the internal development of the Sein und Zeit project, by exploring the coalescence of temporality and foundations; secondly, with respect to the direction and fate of the Sein und Zeit project, by exploring a limited number of "foundational" aspects (fugue, Kehre, Abgrund, Ereignis) of a single but singularly important writing from the 1930's: Beiträge zur Philosophie. In so doing the dissertation aims to bring out the Copernican thought-revolution in the early work, and to provide both the conceptual motivation and the methodological tools for a more farreaching reappreciation of Heidegger's early work. Thus the dissertation has consequences, not only for the foundational, but also for the language-thought problematic, for the possibility of overcoming metaphysics, for Heidegger's general development, and for the appraisal of the position of time in his work.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,742
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Heidegger Be Understood?Richard Schmitt - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):53 – 73.
On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Reading Heidegger Backwards: White's Time and Death.Iain Thomson - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):103 – 120.
Heidegger and the Path of Thinking.John Sallis (ed.) - 1970 - Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Heidegger on Luther on Paul.Timothy Stanley - 2007 - Dialog: A Journal of Theology 46 (1):41-45.
Heidegger Into D(E)Ut(s)Ch.Mark Wildschut - 2005 - Studia Phaenomenologica 5:53-67.
Of Spirit: Heidegger and Derrida on Metaphysics, Ethics, and National Socialism.David Ross Fryer - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):21 – 44.
The Question of Being : Heidegger and Beyond.Peter Wolfendale - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Warwick

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-01-10

Total views
7 ( #978,311 of 2,349,847 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #187,561 of 2,349,847 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes