Accuracy and the Imps

Logos and Episteme 10 (3):263-282 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently several authors have argued that accuracy-first epistemology ends up licensing problematic epistemic bribes. They charge that it is better, given the accuracy-first approach, to deliberately form one false belief if this will lead to forming many other true beliefs. We argue that this is not a consequence of the accuracy-first view. If one forms one false belief and a number of other true beliefs, then one is committed to many other false propositions, e.g., the conjunction of that false belief with any of the true beliefs. Once we properly account for all the falsehoods that are adopted by the person who takes the bribe, it turns out that the bribe does not increase accuracy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Accuracy, Verisimilitude, and Scoring Rules.Jeffrey Dunn - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1):151-166.
Accuracy for Believers.Julia Staffel - 2017 - Episteme 14 (1):39-48.
Good Questions.Alejandro Pérez Carballo - 2018 - In Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij & Jeff Dunn (eds.), Epistemic Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 123-145.
Repugnant Accuracy.Brian Talbot - 2019 - Noûs 53 (3):540-563.
Getting it right.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij & Stephen R. Grimm - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):329-347.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-28

Downloads
188 (#130,710)

6 months
75 (#80,605)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

James M. Joyce
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Brian Weatherson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

A Theory of Assessability for Reasonableness.Andrew T. Forcehimes - 2025 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):1-37.
Epistemic utility theory’s difficult future.Chad Marxen - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):7401-7421.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references