“Ethics after Darwin”

Abstract

Through most of the 20th Century, the influence of Darwin on the philosophical field of ethics was negligible. Things changed noticeably in the last couple of decades or so of that century, and now “evolutionary ethics”—which had lain dormant since Darwin’s contemporary Herbert Spencer—is a lively and hotly debated topic. There are several Darwinian theses that might have bearing on moral philosophy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Darwin was a teleologist.James G. Lennox - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):409-421.
Built for speed, not for comfort.Peter J. Richerson & Robert Boyd - 2001 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23:423-463.
A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics.Robert Richards - 1986 - Biology and Philosophy 1 (3):265-293.
Nietzsche’s Aesthetic Critique of Darwin.Charles H. Pence - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (2):165-190.
Darwin’s place in the history of thought: A reevaluation.Robert J. Richards - 2009 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (Supplement 1):10056-10060.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-16

Downloads
186 (#69,540)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Joyce
Victoria University of Wellington

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references