Philosophy Now 82:14-17 (2011)
Were I not afraid of appearing too philosophical, I should remind my reader of that famous doctrine, supposed to be fully proved in modern times, “That tastes and colours, and all other sensible qualities, lie not in the bodies, but merely in the senses.” The case is the same with beauty and deformity, virtue and vice. This doctrine, however, takes off no more from the reality of the latter qualities, than from that of the former; nor need it give any umbrage either to critics or moralists. Though colours were allowed to lie only in the eye, would dyers or painters ever be less regarded or esteemed? There is a sufficient uniformity in the senses and feelings of mankind, to make all these qualities the objects of art and reasoning, and to have the greatest influence on life and manners. And as it is certain, that the discovery above-mentioned in natural philosophy, makes no alteration on action and conduct; why should a like discovery in moral philosophy make any alteration?
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Return of Moral Fictionalism.Nadeem J. Z. Hussain - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):149–188.
Similar books and articles
Hume and the Second-Quality Analogy.John Corvino - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):157-173.
Mark Eli Kalderon, Moral Fictionalism:Moral Fictionalism.Zed Adams - 2006 - Ethics 117 (1):131-135.
Hutcheson's Aesthetic Realism and Moral Qualities.Susan M. Purviance - 2006 - History of Intellectual Culture.
Moral Fictionalism Versus the Rest.Daniel Nolan, Greg Restall & Caroline West - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):307 – 330.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads312 ( #9,342 of 2,158,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #20,550 of 2,158,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?