Philosophical Psychology 27 (3):401-424 (2014)

Authors
Yasmina Jraissati
American University of Beirut
Abstract
For over a century, the question of the relation of language to thought has been extensively discussed in the case of color categorization, where two main views prevail. The relativist view claims that color categories are relative while the universalistic view argues that color categories are universal. Relativists also argue that color categories are linguistically determined, and universalists that they are perceptually determined. Recently, the argument for the perceptual determination of color categorization has been undermined, and the relativist view has regained some ground. This paper argues that although the universalistic account of color categorization has been called into question, this is not enough to establish relativism. Color categories can still be said to be universal or particular, independent of the accounts of their universality or relativity. Because of its polarization, the debate has disregarded some issues that are key in our understanding of color categorization: the question of what a color category is and how to identify it.
Keywords Basic color terms theory  Categorization  Color  Sapir-Whorf hypothesis  Universalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2012.733815
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,437
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Universals in Color Naming and Memory.Eleanor R. Heider - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):10.
An Opponent-Process Theory of Color Vision.Leo M. Hurvich & Dorothea Jameson - 1957 - Psychological Review 64 (6, Pt.1):384-404.
Language, Thought, and Color: Whorf Was Half Right.Terry Regier & Paul Kay - 2009 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (10):439-446.
Colour: An Exosomatic Organ?B. A. C. Saunders & J. van Brakel - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):212-220.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Misconceptions About Colour Categories.Christoph Witzel - 2019 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10 (3):499-540.
Editorial: Sensory Categories.Yasmina Jraissati - 2019 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10 (3):419-439.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Color Categorization.Robert Briscoe - forthcoming - In Derek Brown & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Routledge Handbook on the Philosophy of Colour. Routledge.
Color Relationalism and Relativism.Alex Byrne & David R. Hilbert - 2017 - Topics in Cognitive Science 9 (1):172-192.
Categorical Perception of Color: Assessing the Role of Language.Yasmina Jraissati - 2012 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):439-462.
Color Nominalism, Pluralistic Realism, and Color Science.Mohan Matthen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):39-40.
Whorfian Effects in Color Perception: Deep or Shallow?Elisabetta Lalumera - 2014 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 9.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-23

Total views
8 ( #953,057 of 2,420,968 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,702 of 2,420,968 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes