Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):35 - 56 (1956)

Abstract
Heidegger is noted for his concern with the nothing, das Nichts, and this may be partially due to the way in which his ideas were first introduced. Whereas the positivists regarded his writings as nonsense, employing his references to nothingness to prove them so, other of his interpreters took his thought seriously but regarded it as fundamentally nihilistic. He was pictured as an irrationalist philosopher, preoccupied with death and negativity. It is this representation of Heidegger which still prevails to a large extent among philosophers in this country. Unlike the positivists, they accept what he says as meaningful and important but as having consequences which must be rejected not only as mistaken but, perhaps, as immoral. That this appraisal requires careful examination is indicated by the fact that not a few theologians have borrowed heavily from Heidegger and found in his writings important positive suggestions. The impression that Heidegger is a nihilist or even an irrationalist is mistaken from the ground up; it is difficult to understand how it could be sustained by anyone who had struggled through any one of Heidegger's essays.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph195610173
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heidegger and the Question of Animality.Simon Glendinning - 1996 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (1):67 – 86.
Heidegger and the Ontology of Freedom.Sarah Sorial - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):205-218.
Being and Existence in Ṣadrā and Heidegger: A Comparative Ontology.Alparslan Ac̲ikgenc̲ - 1993 - International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
Heidegger’s “Polemos”.Gregory Fried - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:159-195.
Love, and Death: Kierkegaard and Heidegger on Authentic and Inauthentic Human Existence.Harrison Hall - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):179 – 197.
Jthe Birth of Difference.Christina Schües - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (2):243-252.
Do Individuals Exist?William F. Vallicella - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:195-220.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
21 ( #511,952 of 2,445,388 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,131 of 2,445,388 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes