Nonconceptual content and the "space of reasons"

Philosophical Review 109 (4):483-523 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Mind and World, John McDowell argues against the view that perceptual representation is non-conceptual. The central worry is that this view cannot offer any reasonable account of how perception bears rationally upon belief. I argue that this worry, though sensible, can be met, if we are clear that perceptual representation is, though non-conceptual, still in some sense 'assertoric': Perception, like belief, represents things as being thus and so.

Similar books and articles

Is there a problem about nonconceptual content?Jeff Speaks - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (3):359-98.
On the nonconceptual content of experience.Michael Tye - 2005 - Schriftenreihe-Wittgenstein Gesellschaft.
Content, illusion, partition.York H. Gunther - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (2):185-202.
Nonconceptual Content and the "Space of Reasons".Richard G. Heck Jr - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):483 - 523.
What might nonconceptual content be?Robert Stalnaker - 2003 - In York H. Gunther (ed.), Essays on Nonconceptual Content. MIT Press. pp. 95-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,543 (#4,262)

6 months
127 (#8,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Kimberly Heck
Brown University

Citations of this work

Perceptual Pluralism.Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2020 - Noûs 54 (4):807-838.
What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
The Intellectual Given.John Bengson - 2015 - Mind 124 (495):707-760.
Perception and the fall from Eden.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 49--125.
Cognitive Penetrability of Perception.Dustin Stokes - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (7):646-663.

View all 209 citations / Add more citations