Bayesianism and reliable scientific inquiry

Philosophy of Science 60 (2):302-319 (1993)
The inductive reliability of Bayesian methods is explored. The first result presented shows that for any solvable inductive problem of a general type, there exists a subjective prior which yields a Bayesian inductive method that solves the problem, although not all subjective priors give rise to a successful inductive method for the problem. The second result shows that the same does not hold for computationally bounded agents, so that Bayesianism is "inductively incomplete" for such agents. Finally a consistency proof shows that inductive agents do not need to disregard inductive failure on sets of subjective probability 0 in order to be ideally rational. Together the results reveal the inadequacy of the subjective Bayesian norms for scientific methodology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289734
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Curve-Fitting for Bayesians?Gordon Belot - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axv061.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Two Dogmas of Strong Objective Bayesianism.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
Inductive Influence.Jon Williamson - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):689 - 708.
The Scope of Bayesian Reasoning.Henry Kyburg - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:139 - 152.
Optimum Inductive Methods.R. Festa - 1993 - Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?Franz Huber - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):101-116.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

150 ( #31,273 of 2,168,605 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,836 of 2,168,605 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums