Use of a computer-based simulated consultation tool to assess whether doctors explore sociocultural factors during patient evaluation

, , , , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1190-5 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Use of a computer‐based simulated consultation tool to assess whether doctors explore sociocultural factors during patient evaluation.Noëlle Junod Perron, Thomas Perneger, Véronique Kolly, Melissa Dominicé Dao, Johanna Sommer & Patricia Hudelson - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1190-1195.
A Phenomenological Defense of Computer-Simulated Frog Dissection.Robert Rosenberger - 2011 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (3):215-228.
Patient Autonomy and the Twenty-First Century Physician.Jeremy R. Garrett & John D. Lantos - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (5):3-3.
Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.F. E. M. Murtagh - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (6):311-315.
Patient consultation survey in an ophthalmic outpatient department.S. A. Aslam, P. Colapinto, H. G. Sheth & R. Jain - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):134-135.
Science: a limited source of knowledge and authority in the care of patients*. A Review and Analysis of: ‘How Doctors Think. Clinical Judgement and the Practice of Medicine.’Montgomery, K. [REVIEW]Andrew Miles - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):545-563.
Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations.R. Pedersen, S. A. Hurst, J. Schildmann, S. Schuster & B. Molewijk - 2010 - Clinical Ethics 5 (3):136-141.
Medical mismanagement or public vacillation?P. N. Bamford - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (4):179-181.
Hospital doctors? views of factors influencing their prescribing.Christina Ljungberg, Åsa Kettis Lindblad & Mary Patricia Tully - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (5):765-771.
Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care.D. W. Robertson - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):292-299.
Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point. [REVIEW]Nanon Labrie - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):171-199.
Roles for knowledge-based computer systems: Case studies in maternity care. [REVIEW]M. Harris, A. P. Jagodzinski & K. R. Greene - 2001 - AI and Society 15 (4):386-395.
Patient computer use to prompt doctor adherence to diabetes management guidelines.Nairmeen A. Haller, Karen M. Gil, William G. Gardner & Frederick C. Whittier - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1118-1124.
Van Gogh and His Doctors: Projections and Counter-Projections.Milly Heyd - 2011 - The European Legacy 16 (3):355-362.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
7 (#1,356,784)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references