II. Reply to Skjei∗

Erling Skjei's criticisms (Inquiry 28, this issue) of my account of communicative action in The Theory of Communicative Action are based on a misunderstanding of the role of the analysis of speech acts in that work. I begin by restating the terms of my analysis, and after dealing with Skjei's objections to my claims for the explanatory power of illocutionary acts, draw attention to a problem with imperatives that I haven't yet done justice to
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201748508602062
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Intentionality.John Searle - 1983 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Relevance of Habermas' Communicative Turn.J. Masschelein - 1991 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 11 (2):95-111.
Threats, Promises and Communicative Action.Joseph Heath - 1995 - European Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):225-241.
On the Performative and the Pragmatic. Performative Vs. Pragmatic Self-Contradictions.Petra Hedberg - 2008 - SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):91-115.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #297,695 of 2,168,955 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,955 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums