Nursing Ethics 18 (5):640-650 (2011)
History has demonstrated the necessity of protecting research participants. Research ethics are based on a concept of asymmetry of power, viewing the researcher as powerful and potentially dangerous and establishing ethics committees as external agencies in the field of research. We argue in favour of expanding this perspective on relationships of power to encompass the ethics committees as one among several actors that exert power and that act in a relational interplay with researchers and participants. We employ Michel Foucault’s ideas of power as an omnipresent force which is dynamic and unstable, as well as the notion that knowledge and power are inextricably intertwined. The article discusses how research ethics committees may affect academic freedom. In addition it is pointed out that research participants could be harmed — not only by unfortunate research practices, but also by being subjected to the protective efforts of ethics monitoring bodies
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
GoverningWellin Community-Based Research: Lessons From Canada’s HIV Research Sector on Ethics, Publics and the Care of the Self: Table 1.Adrian Guta, Stuart J. Murray, Carol Strike, Sarah Flicker, Ross Upshur & Ted Myers - forthcoming - Public Health Ethics:phw024.
Catholic Social Teaching as a Framework for Research Ethics.Alan J. Kearns - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (2):145-159.
Similar books and articles
Protecting and Respecting the Vulnerable: Existing Regulations or Further Protections?Stephanie R. Solomon - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):17-28.
Protecting Human Dignity in Research Involving Humans.Thomas De Koninck - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):17-25.
Tis but a Scratch: The Human Tissue Act and the Use of Tissue for Research, Issues for Research Ethics Committees.David Hunter - unknown
What Journalists and Researchers Have in Common About Ethics.David Kennamer - 2005 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):77 – 89.
Protecting the Vulnerable: Autonomy and Consent in Health Care.Margaret Brazier & Mary Lobjoit (eds.) - 1991 - Routledge.
The Protection of Patients' Rights in Clinical Trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
New Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees: Is Facilitating Research Achieved at the Cost of Participants' Interest.E. Cave - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):318-321.
Evaluating the Science and Ethics of Research on Humans: A Guide for Irb Members.Dennis John Mazur - 2007 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Payment of Research Participants: Current Practice and Policies of Irish Research Ethics Committees.E. Roche, R. King, H. M. Mohan, B. Gavin & F. McNicholas - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):591-593.
Exploratory Health Disparities Research: The Need to Provide a Tangible Benefit to Vulnerable Respondents.Christian Simon & Maghboeba Mosavel - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (1):1-9.
First-in-Human Trial Participants: Not a Vulnerable Population, but Vulnerable Nonetheless.Rebecca Dresser - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (1):38-50.
Research Ethics and the Moral Enterprise of Ethnography: Conjunctions and Contradictions.Sara Ashencaen Crabtree - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare (4):1-20.
Added to index2011-09-07
Total downloads16 ( #299,413 of 2,172,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?