Argumentation 19 (1):1-27 (2005)

ABSTRACT: In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an impor- tant role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are dif- ferent from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.
Keywords analogue  analogy  argument by analogy  assigned-predicate  conclusive analogy  counterpart  different-domain-analogy  inconclusive analogy  one-to-one correspondence  same-domain-analogy  target-subject
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

I. Knowledge of Other Minds.Norman Malcolm - 1958 - Journal of Philosophy 55 (23):969.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Organisms ≠ Machines.Daniel J. Nicholson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):669-678.

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
165 ( #73,095 of 2,533,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #136,433 of 2,533,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes