Are there morally relevant differences between hymen restoration and bloodless treatment for Jehovah’s Witnesses?

BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):89 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hymen reconstruction is a controversial measure performed to help young females under threat of honour-related violence. Official guidelines often reject offering hymen reconstructions. On the other hand, extraordinary measures in order to enable operations of Jehovah’s Witnesses who want a bloodless operation in order to avoid religiously related sanctions are often considered praiseworthy. The aim is thus to examine whether or not there are relevant differences between these two measures

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,509

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Treatment of Patients Who Are Jehovah's Witnesses.P. Wade - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):137-a-138.
Should Informed Consent Be Based on Rational Beliefs?J. Savulescu & R. W. Momeyer - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (5):282-288.
Choosing to Be Stigmatized: Rational Calculus in Religious Conversion.Tudor Pitulac & Sebastian Nastuta - 2007 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 6 (16):80-97.
Is Informed Consent Effective in Trauma Patients?A. Bhangu, E. Hood, A. Datta & S. Mangaleshkar - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):780-782.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-24

Downloads
32 (#362,084)

6 months
1 (#417,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?