The Right Not to Know and the Duty to Tell: The Case of Relatives

Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42 (1):38-52 (2014)
Obtaining and sharing genetic information when there is a potential conflict of interest between patients and their relatives give rise to two questions. Do we have a duty to find out our genetic predispositions for disease for the sake of our relatives, or do we have a right to remain ignorant? Do we have a duty to disclose our known genetic predispositions for disease to our relatives? I argue that the answer to both questions is yes, but to a lesser extent than sometimes claimed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jlme.12117
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Disclosure Two Ways.Erin B. Bernstein - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):245-254.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Is There a Duty to Remain in Ignorance?Iain Brassington - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):101-115.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
12 ( #431,982 of 2,235,796 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #193,244 of 2,235,796 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature