The Right Not to Know and the Duty to Tell: The Case of Relatives

Abstract
Obtaining and sharing genetic information when there is a potential conflict of interest between patients and their relatives give rise to two questions. Do we have a duty to find out our genetic predispositions for disease for the sake of our relatives, or do we have a right to remain ignorant? Do we have a duty to disclose our known genetic predispositions for disease to our relatives? I argue that the answer to both questions is yes, but to a lesser extent than sometimes claimed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jlme.12117
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,507
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Disclosure Two Ways.Erin B. Bernstein - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):245-254.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is There a Duty to Remain in Ignorance?Iain Brassington - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):101-115.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-29

Total downloads
12 ( #445,408 of 2,268,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #211,649 of 2,268,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature