Abstract
There are two clearly opposed camps on the issue of the source of linguistic intuitions that have been labelled competentionalist and ordinarist positions. Competentionalists believe and defend the view that linguistic intuitions have a special status and that linguistic competence is their source, while ordinarists believe and defend the view that linguistic intuitions do not have any special status and that they are not directly derived from linguistic competence. The crucial disagreement is primarily over the source of intuitions. The main question that is addressed in this paper is: Which are the data that competence provides for linguistic intuitions? I try to show that all the criticism mounted against the ordinarist are ill-founded. Competence is not the source of linguistic intuitions. Intuitions do not flow directly from competence. They are the secondary reflections on primary performance.
Keywords linguistic intuitions   competence   central processor   language as skill
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,536
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Are Linguists Better Subjects?Jennifer Culbertson & Steven Gross - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):721-736.
The Emperor’s New Intuitions.Jaakko Hintikka - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):127-147.
Intuitions in Linguistics.Michael Devitt - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):481-513.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Linguistic Intuitions: Error Signals and the Voice of Competence.Steven Gross - forthcoming - In Samuel Schindler, Anna Drożdżowicz & Karen Brøcker (eds.), Linguistic Intuitions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Reply to Dunja Jutronić.Nenad Miščević - 2014 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 10 (2):145-153.
Linguistic Intuition and Calibration.Jeffrey Maynes - 2012 - Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (5):443-460.
Linguistic Intuitions and Cognitive Penetrability.Michael Devitt - 2014 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 9.
Linguistic Intuitions: In Defense of "Ordinarism".Michel Devitt - 2014 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 10 (2):7-20.
Linguistic Intuitions (British Journal for the Philosophy of Science).Gareth Fitzgerald - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):123-160.
Intuitions.Nenad Miščević - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):523-548.
Intuitions.Nenad Miščević - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):523-548.
Intuitions: Epistemology and Metaphysics of Language.Nenad Miščević - 2018 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):253-276.
What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language?Barry C. Smith - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
Intuitions: Rijeka Response to Nenad Miščević.Michael Devitt - 2018 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):277-282.
Linguistic Intuitions Revisited.M. Devitt - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):833-865.
Intuitions in Linguistics.Michael Devitt - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):481-513.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-08

Total views
8 ( #929,421 of 2,385,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #560,835 of 2,385,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes