BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-11 (2021)
AbstractBackgroundIn the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, difficult decisions had to be made on the allocation of testing resources. Similar situations can arise in future pandemics. Therefore, careful consideration of who should be tested is an important part of pandemic preparedness. We focus on four ethical aspects of that problem: how to prioritize scarce testing resources, the regulation of commercial direct-to-consumer test services, testing of unauthorized immigrants, and obligatory testing.Main textThe distribution of scarce resources for testing: We emphasize the use of needs-based criteria, but also acknowledge the importance of choosing a testing strategy that contributes efficiently to stopping the overall spread of the disease. Commercial direct-to-consumer test services: Except in cases of acute scarcity, such services will in practice have to be allowed. We propose that they should be subject to regulation that ensures test quality and adequate information to users. Testing of unauthorized immigrants, their children and other people with unclear legal status: Like everyone else, these individuals may be in need of testing, and it is in society’s interest to reach them with testing in order to stop the spread of the disease. A society that offers comprehensive medical services to unauthorized immigrants is in a much better position to reach them in a pandemic than a society that previously excluded them from healthcare. Obligatory testing: While there are often strong reasons for universal testing in residential areas or on workplaces, there are in most cases better ways to achieve testing coverage than to make testing mandatory.ConclusionIn summary, we propose decision-making primarily based on needs-based criteria, strict regulation but not prohibition of direct-to-consumer test services, test services offered to unauthorized immigrants, preferably as part of comprehensive medical services, and broad outreach of testing services whenever possible, but in general not obligatory testing.
Similar books and articles
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Japan on the Determination of Blood Relationship Via DNA Testing.Waki Toya - 2017 - Asian Bioethics Review 9 (1-2):19-32.
The Ethical Challenges of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
‘Just a Bit of Fun’: How Recreational is Direct-to-Customer Genetic Testing?Heike Felzmann - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (1):20-32.
The Dangers of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease: Comment on “Personal Genomic Testing, Genetic Inheritance, and Uncertainty”.Paul Lacaze, Jane Tiller & Joanne Ryan - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):585-587.
Ethical Considerations in the Testing of Biopharmaceuticals for Adventitious Agents.Richard S. Woodward - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):273-282.
National Symposium on Problems of Presymptomatic Testing for Huntington's Disease, Cardiff.A. Tyler & M. Morris - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):41-42.
"Testing - One, Two, Three... Testing!": Toward a Sociology of Testing.Trevor Pinch - 1993 - Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (1):25-41.
Experiences of Being Tested: A Critical Discussion of the Knowledge Involved and Produced in the Practice of Testing in Children’s Rehabilitation.Wenche S. Bjorbækmo & Gunn H. Engelsrud - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):123-131.
Direct to Consumer Testing in Reproductive Contexts – Should Health Professionals Be Concerned?Heather Skirton - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-9.
Genetic Health Care Services, Present And Near Future In Japan.Ichiro Matsuda - 2003 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13 (2):57-58.
Why Not Order Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Your Children?Eline Bunnik - 2010 - Genomics, Society and Policy 6 (3):1-3.
Increasing Knowledge of Hiv Infection Status Through Opt-Out Testing.Harold W. Jaffe - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):229-233.
Controlling Futures? Online Genetic Testing and Neurodegenerative Disease: Comment on “Personal Genomic Testing, Genetic Inheritance, and Uncertainty”.Narelle Warren & John Gardner - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):593-594.
Commercial Genetic Testing and its Governance in Chinese Society.Suli Sui & Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner - 2015 - Minerva 53 (3):215-234.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions.Govind Persad, Alan Wertheimer & Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2009 - The Lancet 373 (9661):423--431.
An Ethical Framework for Global Vaccine Allocation.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Govind Persad, Adam Kern, Allen E. Buchanan, Cecile Fabre, Daniel Halliday, Joseph Heath, Lisa M. Herzog, R. J. Leland, Ephrem T. Lemango, Florencia Luna, Matthew McCoy, Ole F. Norheim, Trygve Ottersen, G. Owen Schaefer, Kok-Chor Tan, Christopher Heath Wellman, Jonathan Wolff & Henry S. Richardson - 2020 - Science 1:DOI: 10.1126/science.abe2803.
Mandatory Vaccination: An Unqualified Defence.Roland Pierik - 2018 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2):381-398.
Passport to Freedom? Immunity Passports for COVID-19.Rebecca C. H. Brown, Julian Savulescu, Bridget Williams & Dominic Wilkinson - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (10):652-659.