Ideas of heredity, reproduction and eugenics in Britain, 1800–1875

In this paper I begin by arguing that there are significant intellectual and normative continuities between pre-Victorian hereditarianism and later Victorian eugenical ideologies. Notions of mental heredity and of the dangers of transmitting hereditary ‘taints’ were already serious concerns among medical practitioners and laymen in the early nineteenth century. I then show how the Victorian period witnessed an increasing tendency for these traditional concerns about hereditary transmission and the integrity of bloodlines to be projected onto the level of national health. Tracing the gradual emergence of eugenical thought, I also highlight some of the more fundamental social, political and intellectual factors that promoted this predilection for extrapolating from the individual lineage to the nation and race. In doing so I argue that fully fledged eugenical thought was always unlikely to emerge prior to the early Victorian period. However, I am also able to show that Francis Galton's 1865 eugenical proposals were far from innovative and that identifying him as the ‘father’ of the eugenics movement is highly misleading
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1369-8486(00)00028-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,769
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Correspondence of Charles Darwin.Charles Darwin - 1988 - Journal of the History of Biology 21 (3):501-519.
Forging Heredity: From Metaphor to Cause, a Reification Story.Carlos López-Beltrán - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (2):211-235.
Greek Theories on Eugenics.D. J. Galton - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):263-267.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Stuart Mill, Innate Differences, and the Regulation of Reproduction.Diane B. Paul & Benjamin Day - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (2):222-231.
Ideas About Heredity, Genetics, and 'Medical Genetics' in Britain, 1900–1982.William Leeming - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (3):538-558.
Phrenology, Heredity and Progress in George Combe's Constitution of Man.Bill Jenkins - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Science 48 (3):455-473.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Ideas of Heredity, Reproduction and Eugenics in Britain, 1800-1875.C. J. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (3):457-489.
Darwin on Variation and Heredity.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):425-455.
Ideas About Heredity, Genetics, and 'Medical Genetics' in Britain, 1900–1982.William Leeming - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (3):538-558.
What 'Really' Is Eugenics?Gregory K. Pike - 2010 - Bioethics Research Notes 22 (4):47.
The New Eugenics and Medicalized Reproduction.Jacques Testart - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (3):304.
Dewey in Britain.John Darling & John Nisbet - 2000 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 19 (1):39-52.
Liberalism and Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #181,018 of 2,158,877 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #193,365 of 2,158,877 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums