Defending Gödel against Floyd-Putnam's Wittgenstein


Abstract
I argue against Juliet Floyd and Hilary Putnam's (2000, 2004) reading of Wittgenstein's "notorious" paragraph on Gödel's first incompleteness theorem.
Keywords Gödel's incompleteness theorem  Wittgenstein's notorious paragraph
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Gödel Paradox and Wittgenstein's Reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
On Some Much Maligned Remarks of Wittgenstein on Gödel.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Philosophical Investigations 24 (3):262–270.
On Floyd and Putnam on Wittgenstein on Gödel.Timothy Bays - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy 101 (4):197 - 210.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-10

Total views
29 ( #251,402 of 2,319,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #264,889 of 2,319,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature