Hare’s Archangel, Human Fallibility, and Utilitarian Justification(?) of Deception

American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):17-19 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The target article by Christopher Meyers concerning justification of deception for clinical ethicists is both well-reasoned and plausible. Clearly grounded in utilitarian considerations, its...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Virtue and self-deception.Daniel A. Putman - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):549-557.
Why Couldn’t Kant Be A Utilitarian?Toshiro Terada - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 44:242-247.
How We Know What Isn't So.Thomas Gilovich - 1993 - New York, NY, USA: Free Press.
Brain Imaging and Courtroom Deception.Rebecca Dresser - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (6):7-8.
Utilitarianism and Preservation.Eric Katz - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (4):357-364.
Utilitarianism and Preservation.Eric Katz - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (4):357-364.
From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism.James W. McGray - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12 (142):79-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-05

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point.R. M. Hare (ed.) - 1981 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.
Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method and Point.R. M. Hare - 1985 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 90 (2):271-273.
Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method and Point.R. M. Hare - 1983 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 37 (4):643-646.

View all 10 references / Add more references