A dubious defense of ‘after‐birth abortion’: A reply to Räsänen

Bioethics 32 (2):132-137 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scholars have offered various critiques of Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's controversial article, ‘After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?’ My book The Ethics of Abortion: Women's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice presents four such critiques. First, Giubilini and Minerva argue from the deeply controversial to the even more controversial. Second, they presuppose a false view of personal identity called body-self dualism. Third, their view cannot secure human equality. And fourth, their account of harm cannot account for harm found in some cases of murder. In the article, ‘Pro-life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing’, J. Räsänen examines and finds wanting these four critiques. This essay responds to Räsänen's defense of infanticide and argues that his responses to the four objections fail.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Viable Violinist.Michael Hawking - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (4):312-316.
The Viable Violinist.Michael Hawking - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (5):312-316.
After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?Alberto Giubilini & Francesca Minerva - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):261-263.
The Moral Status of Babies.Andrew McGee - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):345-348.
Abortion, Infanticide and Moral Context.Lindsey Porter - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):350-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-24

Downloads
57 (#205,673)

6 months
3 (#211,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Kaczor
Loyola Marymount University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references