Indistinguishable from magic: Computation is cognitive technology [Book Review]

Minds and Machines 20 (1):119-143 (2010)
Abstract
This paper explains how mathematical computation can be constructed from weaker recursive patterns typical of natural languages. A thought experiment is used to describe the formalization of computational rules, or arithmetical axioms, using only orally-based natural language capabilities, and motivated by two accomplishments of ancient Indian mathematics and linguistics. One accomplishment is the expression of positional value using versified Sanskrit number words in addition to orthodox inscribed numerals. The second is Pāṇini’s invention, around the fifth century BCE, of a formal grammar for spoken Sanskrit, expressed in oral verse extending ordinary Sanskrit, and using recursive methods rediscovered in the twentieth century. The Sanskrit positional number compounds and Pāṇini’s formal system are construed as linguistic grammaticalizations relying on tacit cognitive models of symbolic form. The thought experiment shows that universal computation can be constructed from natural language structure and skills, and shows why intentional capabilities needed for language use play a role in computation across all media. The evolution of writing and positional number systems in Mesopotamia is used to transfer the thought experiment of “oral arithmetic” to inscribed computation. The thought experiment and historical evidence combine to show how and why mathematical computation is a cognitive technology extending generic symbolic skills associated with language structure, usage, and change.
Keywords Computation   Formal grammar   Grammaticalization   Intentionality   Pānini   Positional value   Rewrite systems   Sanskrit   Writing
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-010-9185-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Language Instinct.Steven Pinker - 1995 - Harper Perennial.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Transcending Turing Computability.B. Maclennan - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (1):3-22.
Positional Value and Linguistic Recursion.John Kadvany - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5-6):487-520.
A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition.David J. Chalmers - 2011 - Journal of Cognitive Science 12 (4):323-357.
On Implementing a Computation.David J. Chalmers - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (4):391-402.
Concrete Digital Computation: What Does It Take for a Physical System to Compute? [REVIEW]Nir Fresco - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (4):513-537.
Computationalism.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1995 - Synthese 105 (3):303-17.
What Might Dynamical Intentionality Be, If Not Computation?Ronald L. Chrisley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):634-635.
Added to PP index
2010-02-15

Total downloads
54 ( #108,229 of 2,223,792 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #43,997 of 2,223,792 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature