Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):169-189 (1992)
What are the limits of well-being? This question nicely captures one of the central debates concerning the nature of the individual human good. For rival theories differ as to what sort of facts directly constitute a person's being well-off. On some views, well-being is limited to the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain. But other views push the boundaries of well-being beyond this, so that it encompasses a variety of mental states, not merely pleasure alone. Some theories then draw the line here, limiting well-being to the presence of the appropriately broadened set of mental states. But still others extend the limits of well-being even further, so that it is constituted in part by facts that are not themselves mental states at all; on such views, well-being is partly constituted by states of affairs that are “external” to the individual's experiences. In this essay, I want to explore some of this debate by focusing on a particular stretch of the dialectic. That is, I want to think hard about a particular connected series of arguments and counterarguments. These arguments – or, at least, the concerns they seek to express – emerge naturally in the give and take of philosophical discussion. Together they make up a rather simple story, whose plot, in very rough terms, is this: first there is an attempt to push the limits of well-being outward, moving from a narrow to a broader conception; then comes the claim that the resulting notion is too broad, and so we must retreat to a narrower conception after all
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Well-Being Policy: What Standard of Well-Being?Daniel M. Haybron & Valerie Tiberius - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (4):712--733.
The Reduction of Sensory Pleasure to Desire.Chris Heathwood - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):23-44.
The Good Life: A Defense of Attitudinal Hedonism.Fred Feldman - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (3):604-628.
Alienation, Deprivation, and the Well-Being of Persons.Benjamin Yelle - 2014 - Utilitas 26 (4):367-384.
Similar books and articles
Precis of The Limits of Morality. [REVIEW]Shelly Kagan - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):897-901.
Shelly Kagan's The Limits of Morality. [REVIEW]Michael Slote - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):915-917.
Shelly Kagan's The Limits of Morality. [REVIEW]Frances M. Kamm - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):903-907.
Review: Shelly Kagan's The Limits of Morality. [REVIEW]Frances M. Kamm - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):903 - 907.
Review: Shelly Kagan's The Limits of Morality. [REVIEW]Michael Slote - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):915 - 917.
Does Consequentialism Demand Too Much? Recent Work on the Limits of Obligation.Shelly Kagan - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3):239-254.
A Refutation of Ordinary Morality:The Limits of Morality. Shelly Kagan.Peter Singer - 1991 - Ethics 101 (3):625-.
Limits of Thought and Husserl's Phenomenology.Brian Redekopp - 2011 - Dissertation, McGill University
Rational Reconstruction: Preconditions and Limits.Adrian-Paul Iliescu - 1996 - Theoria 11 (3):33-47.
Processing Capacity Limits Are Not Explained by Storage Limits.Graeme S. Halford, Steven Phillips & William H. Wilson - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):123-124.
The Limits of Knowledge and the Limits of Science.José Bermejo - 2010 - Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Servizo de Publicacións E Intercambio.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads229 ( #16,123 of 2,169,749 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #18,974 of 2,169,749 )
How can I increase my downloads?