Evolution and Impartiality

Ethics 124 (2):327-341 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer argue that evolutionary considerations can resolve Sidgwick’s dualism of practical reason because such considerations debunk moral views that give weight to self-interested or partial considerations but cannot threaten the principle of universal benevolence. I argue that even if we grant these claims, this appeal to evolution is ultimately self-defeating. De Lazari-Radek and Singer face a dilemma. Either their evolutionary argument against partial morality succeeds, but then we need to also give up our conviction that suffering is bad; or there is a way to defend this conviction, but then their argument against partiality fails. Utilitarians, I suggest, should resist the temptation to appeal to evolutionary debunking arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.
Moral Psychology And Moral Intuition: A Pox On All Your Houses.Kelby Mason - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):441-458.
Evolution, altruism, and the prisoner's dilemma.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):161-175.
Ethics and Intuitions: A Reply to Singer.Joakim Sandberg & Niklas Juth - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):209-226.
Partiality and World Poverty.Christopher Goodmacher - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):74-85.
Peter Singer's Argument for Utilitarianism.Stephen Buckle - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):175-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-13

Downloads
179 (#100,373)

6 months
6 (#201,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guy Kahane
Oxford University

References found in this work

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.

Add more references