Abstract
Much has been written on Plato’s use of the dialogue form, and his complete avoidance of the usual philosophical treatise or lecture format. I will summarize some familiar points before giving my own view.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Continental Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0093-4240
DOI 10.5840/gfpj20052618
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Interpretation of Plato's Cratylus.Simon Keller - 2000 - Phronesis 45 (4):284-305.
Plato: A Very Short Introduction.Julia Annas - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
The End of Dialogue in Antiquity.Simon Goldhill (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Idealist Epilogue.G. R. G. Mure - 1978 - Clarendon Press.
Plato's Method of Dialectic.Julius Stenzel - 1940 - New York: Arno Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
108 ( #111,194 of 2,533,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #136,750 of 2,533,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes