Philosophy 61 (235):83 - 93 (1986)
Alasdair Maclntyre and Richard Rorty agree on two very fundamental matters, namely, to put it in Rorty's words, ‘that philosophy as practised professionally today lacks any systematic unity’ and that this very fact poses for us now, standing where we stand, ‘a central philosophical problem’.1 It is also true that they both have a much more historicist view of philosophy than does traditional analytic philosophy; they regard the study of the history of philosophy as an integral element in the study of philosophy and think that philosophy is not something to be sharply separated, as a distinct discipline, from other areas of learning
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Neo-Mooreanism, Contextualism, and the Evidential Basis of Scepticism.Duncan Pritchard - 2005 - Acta Analytica 20 (2):3-25.
Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments From Evil.Michael J. Almeida & Graham Oppy - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):496 – 516.
Reid on Scepticism About Agency and the Self.Chris Lindsay - 2005 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (1):19-33.
Contents.Duncan Pritchard - 2016 - In Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton University Press.
Sceptical Insulation and Sceptical Objectivity.Stephen Cade Hetherington - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (4):411 – 425.
The Structure of Sceptical Arguments.Duncan Pritchard - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):37 - 52.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads10 ( #417,055 of 2,143,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,162 of 2,143,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.