Self-Legislation and Prudence in Kant's Moral Philosophy: A Critical Examination of Some Constructivist Interpretations

Dissertation, University of Notre Dame (2000)

Authors
Patrick Kain
Purdue University
Abstract
Moral constructivism is the thesis that values or normative standards for action are not discovered by reason but are the products of rational construction and thus lack mind-independent reality. Many recent commentators and leading proponents of Kantian ethics have suggested that, in virtue of his conception of autonomy, Kant was a moral constructivist. Contrary to these interpreters, I argue that Kant was not a constructivist Kant's moral theory does centrally involve autonomy which he takes to imply that the moral law is tied to the "self-legislation" of every rational will, but this conception actually precludes rather than entails moral constructivism. Part One explores the connection between Kant's account of practical reason and the theory of non-moral value. Contrary to some constructivist interpretations, Kant is entitled to a coherent account of the rationality of prudence independently of his account of moral reason. This suggests that regardless of whether or not Kant considered moral value to be a construction, he is not committed to the claim that all other kinds of value are constructed. Part Two focuses specifically on moral norms and the ontological status of the moral law. Kant's persistent opposition to theological voluntarist views of morality commits him to a conception of self-legislation that is decidedly anti-constructivist. Examination of several recent constructivist reconstructions of Kant's conception of autonomy reveals how they fail to establish constructivism. This dissertation is of both historical and systematic interest. It transforms our understanding of Kant's place in the history of modern ethics, exposes possible gaps in neo-Kantian constructivist theories, and suggests a distinctive sort of "moral realism" that must be taken seriously in its own right
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,541
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Legislation in Kant's Moral Philosophy.Patrick Kain - 2004 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3):257-306.
Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?Paul Formosa - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):170-196.
Kant’s [Moral] Constructivism and Rational Justification.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2011 - In Pihlström & Williams Baiasu (ed.), Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. Wales University Press.
The Autonomy of Morality and the Morality of Autonomy.Robert Stern - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (3):395-415.
What Should I Do?Julian Wuerth - 2013 - Routledge.
The Logic of Political Constructivism.Richard Michael Buck - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Kansas
Kant's Defense of Human Moral Status.Patrick Kain - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):59-101.
Kant's Conception of Virtue.Lara Denis - 2006 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Constructivism and the Argument From Autonomy.Robert Stern - 2012 - In Jimmy Lenman & Yonatan Shemmer (eds.), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 119.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
1 ( #1,558,302 of 2,533,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes