Rome: Centre for Indian and Inter-Religious Studies (1995)
AbstractEven as dismissive of pursuing Comparative Philosophy for achieving East-West synthesis in philosophy, the author maintains the need for “open philosophizing.” “Open philosophizing” is one characterized by dialogical openness to culturally diverse philosophical traditions and thought-patterns.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
“How to Compare?” - On the Methodological State of Comparative Philosophy.Ralph Weber - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (7):593-603.
Similar books and articles
Indian and Muslim Philosophy: A Comparative Study.M. Rafique - 1988 - Ashish Pub. House.
A Perspective on the Meaning of Comparative Philosophy and Comparative Religion Studies: The Case of the Introduction of Indian Buddhism Into China".Tang Yijie - 1983 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 15 (2):39-106.
Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought: An Essay on the Nature of Indian Philosophical Thinking.Jitendranath Mohanty - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Neoplatonism and Indian Philosophy.Paulos Gregorios (ed.) - 2002 - State University of New York Press.
Indian Epistemology and the World and the Individual.P. T. Raju - 1964 - Philosophy East and West 14 (3/4):311-332.
Locating Humour in Indian Buddhist Monastic Law Codes: A Comparative Approach. [REVIEW]Shayne Clarke - 2009 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (4):311-330.
Essays on Indian Philosophy in Comparative Perspective.Carmen Dragonetti - 2009 - G. Olms.