The trouble with transcendental arguments: Towards a naturalization of Roy Bhaskar's early realist ontology

Journal of Critical Realism 4 (1):28-61 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article analyzes and criticizes the transcendental arguments Roy Bhaskar uses to justify his transcendental realist ontology. They are compared to Kant's in the Critique of Pure Reason and a detailed reconstruction of those formulated in A Realist Theory of Science is presented. It is argued that these formulations contain certain ambiguities and are beset with other, more serious, problems. First, Bhaskar's descriptions of scientific practices are far more controversial than is presupposed in his arguments. Second, Bhaskar uses the Kantian concept of transcendental necessity in his transcendental arguments which inevitably connects them to certain Kantian doctrines that are inconsistent with his transcendental realist ontology. Some qualifications of his formulations Bhaskar made in his later writings are also considered and another possible interpretation of his transcendental arguments is presented from the point of view of these qualifications. On this interpretation, Bhaskar seeks to naturalize Kantian transcendental arguments by combining a posteriori premises with a priori philosophical reasoning. It is argued that this kind of naturalized version of transcendental arguments is also problematic. Therefore, it is concluded that Bhaskar's transcendental arguments fail to justify his transcendental realist ontology. Nevertheless, it might be possible to justify at least some of Bhaskar's ontological claims from the perspective of meta-philosophical naturalism. It is maintained that this requires naturalization not just of transcendental arguments but of the whole transcendental realist ontology. One possible form of naturalistic argument that might replace Bhaskar's problematic transcendental arguments is sketched. It is, however, admitted that, desirable though the naturalization of Bhaskar's early ontology may be, more work needs to be done to achieve this goal.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A realist theory of science.Roy Bhaskar - 1975 - New York: Routledge.
Theorising ontology.Roy Bhaskar - 2007 - In Clive Lawson, John Latsis & Nuno Martins (eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology. Routledge.
Phenomenology and the project of naturalization.Dan Zahavi - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):331-47.
Signs, social ontology, and critical realism.Tobin Nellhaus - 1998 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28 (1):1–24.
Transcendental arguments and the problem of dogmatism.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Transcendental arguments: A plea for modesty.Robert Stern - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):143-161.
The Democracy of Objects.Levi R. Bryant - 2011 - Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Introducing Transcendental Dialectical Critical Realism.Roy Bhaskar - 2000 - Journal of Critical Realism 3 (1):15-21.


Added to PP

77 (#184,946)

6 months
3 (#338,877)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tuukka Kaidesoja
University of Helsinki

References found in this work

Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology.Richard Boyd - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:613-662.
Normative naturalism.Larry Laudan - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):44-59.
Philosophy of science naturalized.Ronald N. Giere - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):331-356.
Realism and reality: Some realistic reconsiderations.Jeffrey C. Isaac - 1990 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1):1–31.

Add more references