A quintet, a quartet, a trio, a duo? The epistemic regress problem, evidential support, and skepticism

Philosophia 37 (3):525-534 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his topical article, Andrew Cling claims that the best extant formulation of the so-called epistemic regress problem rests on five assumptions that are too strong. Cling offers an improved version that rests on a different set of three core epistemic assumptions, each of which he argues for. Despite of owing a great deal to Cling’s ideas, I argue that the epistemic regress problem surfaces from more fundamental assumptions than those offered by Cling. There are ultimately two core assumptions—in fact two contradictory strands within the concept of epistemic support—which jointly create a powerful challenge for our pursuit of paramount epistemic values.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,985

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human knowledge and the infinite progress of reasoning.Peter Klein - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):1 - 17.
Internalist Foundationalism and the Problem of the Epistemic Regress.José L. Zalabardo - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):34 - 58.
The trouble with infinitism.Andrew D. Cling - 2004 - Synthese 138 (1):101 - 123.
Epistemic levels and the problem of the criterion.Andrew D. Cling - 1997 - Philosophical Studies 88 (2):109-140.
The epistemic regress problem.Andrew D. Cling - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):401 - 421.


Added to PP

93 (#137,956)

6 months
1 (#485,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Human knowledge and the infinite regress of reasons.Peter D. Klein - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:297-325.
The Sceptics.R. J. Hankinson - 1995 - Routledge.
Who is Afraid of Epistemology’s Regress Problem?Scott F. Aikin - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):191-217.
When infinite regresses are not vicious.Peter Klein - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):718–729.

View all 14 references / Add more references