Is There A Quasi-Mereological Account of Property Incompatibility?

Acta Analytica 26 (2):115-133 (2011)
Abstract
Armstrong’s combinatorial theory of possibility faces the obvious difficulty that not all universals are compatible. In this paper I develop three objections against Armstrong’s attempt to account for property incompatibilities. First, Armstrong’s account cannot handle incompatibilities holding among properties that are either simple, or that are complex but stand to one another in the relation of overlap rather than in the part/ whole relation. Secondly, at the heart of Armstrong’s account lies a notion of structural universals which, building on an objection by David Lewis, is shown to be incoherent. I consider and reject two alternative ways of construing the composition of structural universals in an attempt to meet Lewis’ objection. An important consequence of this is that all putative structural properties are in fact simple. Finally, I argue that the quasi-mereological account presupposes modality in a way that undermines the reductionist aim of the combinatorialist theory of which it is a central part. I conclude that Armstrong’ quasi-mereological account of property incompatibility fails. Without that account, however, Armstrong’s combinatorial theory either fails to get off the ground, or else must give up its goal of reducing the notion of possibility to something non-modal
Keywords David Armstrong  David Lewis  Property incompatibility  Reduction of modality  Mereology  Structural universals
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12136-010-0090-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,013
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7 (3):429-440.
A World of States of Affairs.John Heil & D. M. Armstrong - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (1):115.
A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility.D. M. Armstrong - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Universals and Scientific Realism.D. M. Armstrong - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Armstrong on the Spatio-Temporality of Universals.Ernâni Magalhães - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):301 – 308.
The Operator Theory of Instantiation.Peter Forrest - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):213 – 228.
Combinatorialism and the Possibility of Nothing.David Efird & Tom Stoneham - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):269 – 280.
Structure-Making.Kris McDaniel - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):251-274.
Structural Universals and Formal Relations.Joan Pagès - 2002 - Synthese 131 (2):215 - 221.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-02-24

Total views
306 ( #15,206 of 2,312,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #320,266 of 2,312,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature