History of European Ideas 44 (6):795-811 (2018)

Abstract
ABSTRACTThis paper proposes an intellectual history of the idea that the later Roman empire and, subsequently, the whole of Byzantium were less ‘free’ in comparison to the Roman Republic. Anxiety over diminished freedom recurred throughout Roman history, but only a few specific expressions of it were enshrined in modern thought as the basis on which to divide history into periods. The theorists of the Enlightenment, moreover, invented an unfree Byzantium for their own political purposes and not by examining the facts about its political culture. The second part of the paper proposes that the Byzantines valorized a model of positive freedom as legal-institutional protection against arbitrary oppressive power, including against both barbarian domination and domestic abuses. In contrast to modern thought, which tends to see the imperial position as the chief threat to liberty, the Byzantines viewed it as its bulwark. Yet they too had remedies for oppressive emperors, suggesting that the otherwise well-attested invocations of freedom were not a mere rhetorical trope for them but an actionable cultural norm.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/01916599.2018.1513706
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

明治維新の源流.Hideo Ando - 1969 - Tokyo: Kinokuniya.
L’origine Des Titres Impériaux À Byzance.Louis Bréhier - 1906 - Byzantinische Zeitschrift 15 (1):161-178.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Freedom, Ethical Choice and the Hellenistic Polis.Benjamin Gray - 2018 - History of European Ideas 44 (6):719-742.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Neo-Roman Liberty.G. Maddox - 2002 - History of Political Thought 23 (3):418-431.
La Boétie and the Neo-Roman Conception of Freedom.Marta García-Alonso - 2013 - History of European Ideas 39 (3):317-334.
Democratical Gentlemen and the Lust for Mastery.Daniel Kapust - 2013 - Political Theory 41 (4):648-675.
Reply.Quentin Skinner - 2009 - Hobbes Studies 22 (2):199-207.
Four Conceptions of Freedom.Horacio Spector - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (6):780-808.
Hayek’s Neo-Roman Liberalism.Sean Irving - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 19 (4):553-570.
Augustine and Republican Liberty.Michael Lamb - 2017 - Augustinian Studies 48 (1):119-159.
Ignorance, Incompetence and the Concept of Liberty.Michael Garnett - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (4):428–446.
Freedom of Thought as a Basic Liberty.Lucas Swaine - 2018 - Political Theory 46 (3):405-425.
Augustine and the Rhetoric of Roman Decline.Andrew R. Murphy - 2005 - History of Political Thought 26 (4):586-606.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-26

Total views
3 ( #1,260,878 of 2,348,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,546 of 2,348,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes