Philosophy of Language and the Language of Philosophy: a New Approach to Functional Classification of the World’s Languages

Filosofiâ I Kosmologiâ 25:88-107 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to describe the author’s approach to the classification of a special group of the world’s languages, performed independently of their ethnic origin but according to their functions, which are realized in the speech and language activities of people. The paper suggests the psycholinguistic bases, which were previously unknown in the philosophy of language, for grouping the world’s languages in the areas of their functioning in the communicative and speech experience of each person both in individual polyethnic, multicultural countries and on a global scale, regardless of one or another particular ethnic language. The paper describes each of the language varieties, united in one functional group according to their psycholinguistic purpose. The presented functional and psycholinguistic classification of languages is characterized by taking into account constant and variable factors that influence the relationship between language and each person in a society. Such factors include the functions performed by a particular type of language in the speech activity of its subject, people’s social assessment in relation to functionally oriented types of languages, the scope of their implementation in life and human activity. A characteristic feature of the described classification is the consideration of higher mental functions of man, the implementation of which is carried out through these types of languages, and through specific means for each of these languages.Psycholinguistic paradigm in the classification of languages by their functional psychosocial orientation allows us not only to present the problems of philosophy of language in a new perspective, but also to create prerequisites and conditions for maximum verbal harmonization of planetary society, its evolution through functionally oriented languages, and to achieve “appropriate communication,” ensuring realization of language rights and freedoms of every person.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Languages and Languages as Framework of Philosophies.Pablo Lopez Lopez - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:137-141.
Index sets for ω‐languages.Douglas Czenzer & Jeffrey B. Remmel - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (1):22-33.
Language Relativity.Serghey Gherdjikov - 2019 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):133-144.
Status of Ethnic Languages on the Face of Globalization.Erbina V. Nikitina - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 72:105-110.
On Relational and Functional Languages.Vladimir Shalack - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (1):25-32.
The great mosaic eye: language and evolution.Robin Allott - 2001 - Sussex, England: Book Guild.
What Counts as a ‘Good’ Metaphysical Language?J. T. M. Miller - 2021 - In James Miller (ed.), The Language of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 102-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-13

Downloads
2 (#1,775,919)

6 months
2 (#1,244,653)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy of Language.Scott Soames - 2010 - Princeton University Press.
The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language.Ernest LePore & Barry C. Smith (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of language.Michael P. Wolf - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references