Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):57-77 (2008)

Abstract
Lewis has objected to Armstrong's notion of a structural universal on the grounds that it violates the Principle of Uniqueness of Composition (PUC), which says that given some parts, there is only one whole that they compose. This paper reviews Armstrong's case for structural universals, and then attempts to reconcile structural universals with PUC by arguing for the existence of arrangement universals. The latter are not only a key to defending structural universals against Lewis' objection, but are in fact essential to Armstrong's conception of structural universals in general. Three objections to my proposal are deflected, and two alternative proposals are shown to be inferior to it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/9789401206020_003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,133
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Properties.Francesco Orilia & Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Structural Universals.A. R. J. Fisher - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (10):e12518.
On Occurrences of Types in Types.Wayne A. Davis - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (2):349-363.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
163 ( #64,588 of 2,448,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #64,958 of 2,448,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes