Authors
Hans Kamp
University of Texas at Austin
Abstract
This paper presents a sound and complete proof system for the first order fragment of Discourse Representation Theory. Since the inferences that human language users draw from the verbal input they receive for the most transcend the capacities of such a system, it can be no more than a basis on which more powerful systems, which are capable of producing those inferences, may then be built. Nevertheless, even within the general setting of first order logic the structure of the formulas of DRS-languages, i.e. of the Discourse Representation Structures suggest for the components of such a system inference rules that differ somewhat from those usually found in proof systems for the first order predicate calculus and which are, we believe, more in keeping with inference patterns that are actually employed in common sense reasoning.This is why we have decided to publish the present exercise, in spite of the fact that it is not one for which a great deal of originality could be claimed. In fact, it could be argued that the problem addressed in this paper was solved when Gödel first established the completeness of the system of Principia Mathematica for first order logic. For the DRS-languages we consider here are straightforwardly intertranslatable with standard formulations of the predicate calculus; in fact the translations are so straightforward that any sound and complete proof system for first order logic can be used as a sound and complete proof system for DRSs: simply translate the DRSs into formulas of predicate logic and then proceed as usual. As a matter of fact, this is how one has chosen to proceed in some implementations of DRT, which involve inferencing as well as semantic representation; an example is the Lex system developed jointly by IBM and the University of Tübingen )
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00159343
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Natural Deduction System for Discourse Representation Theory.Werner Saurer - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (3):249 - 302.
Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning.Donald Kalish - 1964 - New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Discourse Representation Theory.Bart Geurts - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Incremental Dynamics.Jan van Eijck - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (3):319-351.
Dynamic Bracketing and Discourse Representation.Albert Visser & Kees Vermeulen - 1996 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (2):321-365.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
57 ( #182,563 of 2,439,610 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,499 of 2,439,610 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes