Essays in Philosophy 12 (2):7 (2011)

Scientists often reach provisional agreement solutions to problems central to their disciplines, whereas philosophers do not. Although philosophy has been practiced by outstanding intellects for over two thousand years, philosophers have not reached agreement, provisional or otherwise, on the solution or dissolution of any central philosophical problem by philosophical methods. What about philosophy’s future? Until about 1970, philosophers were generally optimistic. Some pinned their hopes on revolution in methodology, others on reform of practice. The case for gradual reform still finds articulate advocates in philosophers like Michael Dummett and Timothy Williamson, but many philosophers today suspect that perennial disagreement may be inescapable. I consider three explanations for the inescapability of perennial disagreement—Richard Rorty’s relativism, Colin McGinn’s skepticism, and Nicholas Rescher’s pluralism—and find each wanting. I argue that a better explanation is the resistance of philosophers to commit, as scientists do, to formulating testable theories and collecting data to help decide between competing theories. I close by proposing that experimental philosophy, a movement still in its infancy, holds the promise of reuniting philosophy with science and moving philosophers closer to agreement on the solution of its central problems
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/eip20111227
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Experimental Philosophy Manifesto.Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols - 2007 - In Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 3--14.
Past the Linguistic Turn?Timothy Williamson - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Clarendon Press.
Empirical Philosophy and Experimental Philosophy.Jesse Prinz - 2007 - In Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 189--208.
Experimental Philosophy of Art.Richard Kamber - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2):197-208.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy as the Behaviorist Views It?Hannes Rusch - 2014 - In Christoph Luetge, Hannes Rusch & Matthias Uhl (eds.), Experimental Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 264-282.
Problem Solving as a Function of the Situation.Melvin R. Marks - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (1):74.
Multiple Versus Single Problem Training in Human Problem Solving.Jack A. Adams - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (1):15.
Acquisition and Extinction of Problem-Solving Set.R. Allen Gardner & Willard N. Runquist - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):274.
Arithmetic Problem Solving.Margaret J. Peterson & Sonia Aller - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):93.
Encoding Effects on Complex Problem Solving.Roger I. Simon - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):227.


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #319,201 of 2,348,923 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #186,326 of 2,348,923 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes