Physician‐assisted suicide, the doctrine of double effect, and the ground of value

Ethics 109 (3):586-605 (1999)
Abstract
In this article, I shall present three arguments for thc pcrmissibility 0f physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and then examine several objections 0f 21 "K21nti2m" and non-Kantian nature against them. These are really 0bjcctions against certain types of suicide. I shall focus 0n active PAS (eg., when 21 patient takes 21 lethal drug given by E1 physician, in which case both thc physician and patient are active). I shall assume the patient is 21 competent, responsible, rational agent, who gives his being in physical discomfort (pain, nausea, ctc.) as thc reason for intending his death. I am assuming, therefore, thc pain while 21 sourcc of suffering docs not undermine his rational agency in 21 way that threatens responsibility for choice.] Current legal proposals for permitting PAS focus 0n procedures..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/233923
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,687
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Immanuel Kant, His Philosophy and Medicine.Urban Wiesing - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):221-236.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

133 ( #33,763 of 2,146,211 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #280,490 of 2,146,211 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums