Utilitas 20 (1):111-142 (2008)

Authors
Frances Myrna Kamm
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
Some of the commentators on Intricate Ethics complain of my method. One finds the main ideas ‘Kammouflaged’ because the relevant causal distinctions are so fine-grained and the cases that illustrate them so numerous. Some say that they do not have the intuitions about many cases that I have, that I concoct dubious and ad hoc distinctions and invest them with moral significance; I am Ptolemaic in that new crystalline spheres and epicycles are constantly being added in an attempt to fix the appearances.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820807002944
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,819
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility.Rowan Cruft - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):393 - 401.
Intricate Ethics.Elinor Mason - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (4):621-623.
Response to Commentators on “What's Wrong With Enhancement?”.Frances Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):W4-W9.
The Doctrine of Triple Effect and Why a Rational Agent Need Not Intend the Means to His End.John Harris - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 74:41-57.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-21

Total views
34 ( #324,957 of 2,463,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,456 of 2,463,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes